washoku and the kitchen (part one)...

|
If you read my earlier post outlining a rigorous schedule for weekly cookbook reviews, you can wholly disregard it.

Ahem.

I'll break up all that ambition into smaller segments that I can actually accomplish, starting with my impressions of Washoku: Recipes from the Japanese Home Kitchen by Elizabeth Andoh. This is the first of the many cookbooks I hope to use and write about in the near future.

It's not necessary for me to point out that these book reviews are going to be amateur to their core except to explain one thing: I am going to skip summarizing, and sometimes whole chapters, and write solely about how the book fits into my own habits (which I hope to explain later). These should be among the least objective reviews you might find.

Now then.

Washoku, "harmony of food," doesn't sound far from that vague notion of Zen that I assume we westerners have: a holistic, intrinsic, intentional sense of things that make those things, strangely, work smoothly. That and a sense of calm, right? It's as if you have real purpose when you, say, put on your socks in the morning. That it means something and gives you satisfaction back.

I'm not mocking any of this but I do want to write superficially. What I appreciate about this book is that the following principles don't require anything spiritual to work. For my own purposes, I want to distill these and any ideas into the practical essence of why they work and leave spirituality for another time.

The principles are simple, that within each meal the foods represent the following:
  • Five colors: red, yellow, green, black (or dark purple, brown, etc.) and white
  • Five tastes: salty, sour, sweet, bitter and spicy
  • Five ways (cooking methods): simmering, broiling, steaming, baking, frying, raw, etc.
  • Five senses: taste, sight, sound, smell, touch (texture)
You can read the actual excerpt here.

My takeaway from this book is almost solely in these few paragraphs, and the practical theory they suggest grounds an idea I've had trouble closing for some time: variety itself is the best philosophy in the kitchen. This would be true if you're worried about losing weight, eating enough vitamins, getting more enjoyment out of food, etc. If you start with color, which is the most basic (a colorful plate of food is a virtue that was instilled in me many years ago), you can immediately improve upon the basic meat (white/brown), potatoes (white/brown) canned veggies (green or yellow, mostly). Unless you're using food dye you'd need at least two vegetables to make this happen (even with colorful spices).

Also with a variety of cooking methods I see these principles as freeing a cook from the need to be too healthful in their thinking. Deep frying is one of the least healthful ways to cook. Steaming is one of the healthiest. You don't have to eat only steamed foods, however, if you keep your methods of cooking in balance, and that can give you a wider variety of foods to enjoy. I've recently rediscovered the joy of frying in oil and I don't feel guilty when it's a small portion of my diet.

This also works well for me because I try to avoid light and low-fat versions of foods. My ideal use of food (which is not yet a reality, I'll admit) would not lose on flavor or richness to low-fat, but would use variety and portions to keep everything in check. This is sometimes referred to as the French Paradox. In France they eat lots of rich foods that healthy Americans would shun but they remain in better shape.

I don't remember the article but I read that perhaps it should be called the American Paradox: a unhealthy nation that is obsessed with the idea of healthy eating.

And I'll point out that I buy as much "low-sodium" as I can, because most processed foods are over salted. This leads to:

The Spice of Life by Jack Turner from Bon Appetit Magazine (March 2009). This article points to some evidence that spices can actually be used to trigger self-regulation of portion control in a person. Strong senses of flavor, aside from the usual saltiness or sweetness, send signals to the brain that tells one to stop eating. Picture fries and a milkshake versus Indian food.

There's also evidence of other healthful effects that come from spices: changes to metabolic rates, the burning and absorption of fat, etc. Certain spices trigger certain effects.

But it's right here, after all this talk of healthful foods and metabolic rates, that I want to stop and try to really make my method clear: In the end, when I've got my techniques down, my recipe book full and my routine settled,

I don't want to think about any of this crap.

Ever.


I don't want to spend time counting calories, scheduling certain foods to certain times, reading every study about how good this food is for you this week and bad the next, and I don't want to be so reliant on a certain food that I can't live without it if I should lose access.

And in washoku I have the answer. Just mix it up.

I truly believe that if you have enough variety, both consistently and serendipitously, you will come out ahead. The amount of good you eat will vastly outpace the bad. It doesn't need to be any more specific than that.

Before I can comment on the recipes of this book I should probably try one or two out as per my plan, but there are a few thoughts I can give after spending some time trying to build a menu.

The double-edge of a variety of foods is the cost of food. Rice is cheap in bulk, but a particular breed of fish can be a large chunk of your food budget. Since I'm not a man of money I look for recipes that don't require me to buy every ingredient new from Whole Foods, and in that sense this book is tough (it may actually be a problem with my whole plot to cook a tour of world foods). The recipes also have no pictures for reference and lean on the denser side.

But I have to mention the wonderful sections about ingredients (example). In these sections, split up into categories like Noodles, Rice, Pickles, Spices and Seasonings, etc, there are detailed descriptions and full-page photographs that show off every item. There are also chapters on the different techniques used. I'm sure if I spend more time on these chapters the recipes would seem much simpler.

My final verdict on the book will have to wait until dinner, but I think it's clear that I've been waiting anxiously for the philosophy to arrive in my kitchen. So far, I'll consider it a win.

Now to get cooking...

Deep commuter's thoughts...

|

On my way to work today I wondered what it would be like to be a guest on The Daily Show. Not that I'd deserve to be on, but really. What would it be like to see it from the other side?

more than words...

|






N.A.S.A. - Spacious Thoughts (feat. Tom Waits & Kool Keith)

This is a few months old, but I love this more than I am able to say...

in the meantime...

|
Just watch this. There's nothing you need to know, and knowing would not add any value. In fact, just don't think about it at all.

Just watch and listen, and enjoy a little comic gold. Brilliance, even.



That is all.

down but not out...

|
I'm noticing a pattern here...

Major deadline at work. Two, maybe three weeks without a day off.

But I'm not complaining. I just wish I had this blogging thing down cold. I should learn to blog on the Metro...

Anyway, it'll be a day or two.

get cooking...

|


When it comes to Christmas I am a bit difficult. If asked what I would like for a gift, I want to say "nothing," which is a half-truth. What I want is always something big like an iPhone or Wii, but no one can afford that, and I have no imagination for small, $10-20 items. DVDs take up space in the world of Hulu and Netflix, I try to stay away from plastic items that don't have to be made of plastic, and I'd much rather just hang out with family than give gifts at all. I actually want nothing. In the end, my suffering wife is the one having to do my job for me.

And this year she scored big.

I was only vaguely aware that she was using the power of Amazon to make a wish list for everyone to use. On it she starting flagging cookbooks like it was a shopping spree. When the time came to open presents, our library of cookbooks tripled. Eight new books, eight entirely different styles of cooking.

Score! Here's the roster, in order of top (of the stack) to bottom:


This massive stack of dead trees comes at a time when I am actively searching not only for new recipes to use, but an overall method or style of cooking that supports two working adults with slightly erratic schedules. To this end I must mention another source that has been very important to my search, JustBento.com by Maki. This is a fantastic cooking site, and one of the main reasons I have decided that a blog can be a worthwhile pursuit (yet to be realized here). If you don't know from bentos do yourself a favor and check it out.

There's one more stack to throw on the pile: the 2008 issues of Bon Appetit magazine. We were given a year's subscription for Christmas '07, and I'd say we've used them to 5% of their potential. I hope to relive each month's issue this year to make up for lost time. If we can keep it up we'll subscribe anew.

So now that I've buried myself in all this material...what the hell am I thinking? As I've mentioned my wife and I both work, but she also has the burden of a graduate program to deal with, so I am trying- so far failing- to be the housekeeper of sorts. Jeeves, if you will. But in addition to attempting to make every meal, I'm also burdening myself with issues like organic, local, avoiding prepared foods, lower sodium, weight control, budgeting, etc, all on a commuter's schedule. How exactly I'll fit all this in will be a work in progress, but in this blog this is what I intend to do:

  • Lunch: I'll continue what I've been trying to do, which is make a a bento lunch for each weekday. I don't plan to blog this unless something unusual comes out of it.
  • Dinner: Each week, I will select one of the new cookbooks and make at least one complete meal from it. I'll give my impressions on the blog, both of the meal and of the book, also my impressions of cooking in that particular style. After I've done all eight books I'll either start over or move on.
  • Extra: I will pour over each month's edition of Bon Appetit, try to extract as many recipes as I feel like using, and figure it out from there. They always have good cocktails recipes...

For this week I will use Washoku: Recipes from the Japanese Home Kitchen by Elizabeth Andoh. I'm starting with this book because, as I will explain later, it has a particular philosophy to cooking that is hard to ignore. It's nothing mystical or existential but has the allure of a solid foundation on which to build.

Stand by...

p.s. It has been requested that I note: I had to pause writing halfway through this post because writing had gotten in the way of me actually making today's lunch. D'oh...

suit up, dwayne johnson (part one)...

|
It's Sunday morning. Daylight Savings Time has passed. I fire up the Interweb and learn that Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson hosted last night's Saturday Night Live.



And I think: I cannot let this opportunity pass by. Now is the time for me to speak.

I think Batman should be played by none other than Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson.

Applause.

The best and most consistent incarnation of Batman around is, to my mind, Batman: The Animated Series. It is known for its strong artistic style- along with the mixture of cunning and insanity, thoughtful writing and pulp fiction. I would say it accomplishes some very ambitious heights yet always remembers it's about a man who dresses as a flippin' bat!

Ahem.

It is from this show, almost solely, that I base my thoughts.

Christian Bale is fine. I've come a long way to appreciating him as an actor. I first saw him in the update of Shaft and thought he was some nobody trying to channel Tom Cruise. Equilibrium is pretty enjoyable. I don't have the stomach to try American Psycho. Did anyone like The Velvet Goldmine? But then comes The Prestige, and I'm a fan.

That said, I don't care for Batman Begins almost to the point of hating it. My lovely assistant, YouTube, will help me demonstrate why:



From here they set up a series of focus groups to test various symbols: bats, geckos, scarecrows, etc.

Not really. This is how it feels, however. In the attempt to make Batman more real, to rationalize the insane notion that a human would dress up like a bat to fight crime, the filmmakers turn the process into a business meeting. This, I believe, was their explicit goal. There's only one problem:

He still dresses up like a BAT.

Insanity required.

Not just insanity, however. Casual insanity. Batman does not feel the need to explain himself (it's here I should point out I'm sick of origin stories in general). The choice of bats is simple: bats scare him. Done. He does not have to justify every inch of his costume (don't be shy. Say it with me: Costume). Batman does not think excessively about these things unless he is forced to. He's rich, he's strong, he's trained, he's crazy. Batman it is.

But enough of this hate. I enjoyed The Dark Knight a lot.

My true quest is to make the case for Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as Batman, which will have to be put into its own posting. Let me first sow some praise for him in general. For a man who started his career in the arguably laughable world of professional wrestling, when he was known only for his eyebrow and elbow (and for that which he was cooking), critics consistently say he delivers in his movies, good and bad, and can even be the best part (Be Cool, anyone?). Compare him to Arnold, Vin, Sly and other actors of that physical size and ask yourself: who has been best at being the Action Hero and doing comedies, children's films, and speaking English? He's confident, he's strong, he's charming, and does not worry about explaining himself.

Sound like anyone?

to be continued...